Nepedia
Back to Discover
Advanced Reader
🏛️

Stolen Generations

history Maturity 13-18 war conflict social justice Next article →

This article covers sensitive topics: war_conflict, social_justice. Parents can manage visibility in Parental Controls.

The Stolen Generations refers to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children removed from their families. This occurred through the actions of Australian federal and state government agencies and church missions. These removals were carried out under specific laws passed by various parliaments. The policy primarily targeted children of mixed descent, often referred to in historical documents using derogatory terms. This practice lasted for many decades, roughly between 1905 and 1967. In some areas, these removals continued into the 1970s.

QVB135lg
QVB135lg

Government leaders used a policy called assimilation to justify these actions. Many officials believed that Indigenous populations were facing extinction following contact with white settlers. They assumed that full-blood tribal populations could not sustain themselves. Leaders like A.O. Neville, the Chief Protector of Aborigines in Western Australia, believed mixed-race children could be trained for work. The goal was to have these children marry into white society over several generations. This would eventually absorb them into the dominant culture.

A.O. Neville, Australia's Coloured Minority - Assimilation Policy
A.O. Neville, Australia's Coloured Minority - Assimilation Policy

Different states implemented these policies through various legislative acts. Victoria passed laws in 1869 and 1886 to allow removals from Aboriginal reserves. In the Northern Territory, the Aboriginals Act 1910 made the Chief Protector the legal guardian of every mixed-descent child up to age 18. This gave the government total legal control over these children. In New South Wales, an amendment in 1915 allowed the removal of children without proving they were neglected. Some members of Parliament at the time warned that this was like stealing children.

State agents and police officers were responsible for locating and transferring children. These officers often moved babies and children into government or missionary institutions. Examples of these places include the Moore River Native Settlement in Western Australia. Other sites included the Doomadgee Aboriginal Mission and various Catholic missions like Beagle Bay. In these institutions, children were trained for specific roles in society. Boys were generally trained as agricultural labourers for farms. Girls were trained as domestic servants for households.

QVB135lg
QVB135lg

Life within these institutions was often very difficult for the children. Many facilities suffered from poor infrastructure and insufficient resources. Children frequently lacked adequate clothing, food, and shelter. The institutions also enforced strict discipline and discouraged the use of Indigenous languages. Many children were subjected to physical and emotional abuse. The 1997 Bringing Them Home report found that many children also experienced sexual assault. These institutions often failed to keep accurate records of the children's parentage or birth details.

QVB135lg
QVB135lg

Determining the exact number of children removed is a complex challenge. Official government estimates suggest that between one in ten and one in three Indigenous children were taken. In certain regions between 1910 and 1970, these proportions were very high. The Bringing Them Home report estimated that at least 100,000 children were removed. This figure was based on a maximum estimate of one in three children. However, other researchers provide different figures. For example, academic Robert Manne estimated the number was between 20,000 and 25,000.

QVB135lg
QVB135lg

The impact of these policies remains a significant part of Australian history. The 1997 Bringing Them Home Royal Commission report described these removal policies as genocide. This report examined how children were taken through force, deception, or threat. Some parents were even told their children had died when they had not. In response to this history, the nation has sought ways to acknowledge the harm caused. In 2008, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd issued a formal apology to Indigenous Australians.

RuddSorry
RuddSorry

This moment was part of a broader effort to address the legacy of the Stolen Generations.

Lord Mayor's National Sorry Day Celebration 2016 King George Square Brisbane P1440439
Lord Mayor's National Sorry Day Celebration 2016 King George Square Brisbane P1440439
590 words

Where will your curiosity go next?

Keep exploring at your chosen reading level.

🖼️ Images & Media (5)
File:QVB135lg.jpg
QVB135lg.jpg
File:A.O. Neville, Australia's Coloured Minority - Assimilation Policy.jpg
A.O. Neville, Australia's Coloured...
File:Lord Mayor's National Sorry Day Celebration 2016 King George Square Brisbane P1440439.jpg
Lord Mayor's National Sorry Day...
File:RuddSorry.jpg
RuddSorry.jpg
File:Apology to Australia's Indigenous Peoples.jpg
Apology to Australia's Indigenous Peoples.jpg
More to explore

What is Nepedia?

A free, ad-free encyclopedia for children. Every article is written at five reading levels, so the same page works for a five-year-old and a fifteen-year-old — use the level switcher above to see this one change. No account needed to read.