Nepedia
Back to Discover
Advanced Reader
🧬

Incertae sedis

life science Maturity 9-11 Next article →

In the study of biology, scientists use a system called taxonomy to organize every living thing. This system creates a complex hierarchy, much like a massive family tree. Every species, from a tiny bacterium to a giant whale, has a specific place within this tree. However, sometimes a discovery does not fit neatly into any existing branch. When a scientist cannot determine the correct taxonomic position for a group, they use the term *incertae sedis*. This is a Latin phrase that translates to "of uncertain position."

Varanops BW
Varanops BW

It serves as a formal way to acknowledge that a group's relationships are unknown or undefined.

There are several scientific reasons why a taxon might be labeled *incertae sedis*. One common cause is a poor or inadequate description. If the original researcher did not provide enough physical details, later scientists may struggle to categorize it. Another issue is the presence of extensive homoplasies. This occurs when different species evolve similar traits independently, which can mislead researchers during analysis. Additionally, apparent character state reversals or convergent evolution can make a species look more like one group when it actually belongs to another.

These complexities create confusion that prevents a certain classification.

In the field of paleontology, the lack of physical evidence often leads to uncertainty. Many fossils are defined based only on partial information. For example, if a phylogenetic analysis—a study of evolutionary relationships—is built using soft tissue and vertebrae, a fossil consisting only of a single tooth cannot be placed accurately. Without more body parts to study, scientists cannot guess the correct position. They choose to label the taxon *incertae sedis* rather than risk an incorrect assignment. This is also true in modern molecular phylogenies. It is often very difficult to obtain tissue samples from rare organisms for DNA testing.

Colostethus ruthveni 350364947
Colostethus ruthveni 350364947

Without this genetic data, the organism's place on the tree of life remains a mystery.

Taxonomic uncertainty can also arise from scientific controversy. When researchers produce conflicting results, there may be no consensus on how a taxon relates to other organisms. Until the conflict is resolved through further study, the group remains *incertae sedis*. It is important to distinguish this from other types of uncertainty. For instance, *nomen dubium* refers to a name of unknown application, often because the original specimen is lost. Similarly, *cf.* is used in paleontology to suggest a specimen should be compared to a known species but is not a certain match. *Incertae sedis* specifically addresses the unknown evolutionary position, not just a confusing name.

History provides many examples of organisms that were once *incertae sedis* but were later classified. New World vultures, such as the California condor, were once placed in the class Aves *incertae sedis*. Scientists were unsure of their specific order until the order Cathartiformes was recognized.

Gymnogyps californianus us fish 3
Gymnogyps californianus us fish 3

Another example is Bocage's longbill, a passerine bird. It was classified as *Passeroidea incertae sedis* because its family was unclear. A 2015 phylogenetic study finally placed it within the family Motacillidae. These examples demonstrate how advancing technology and new research eventually solve taxonomic mysteries.

Today, many strange and unique organisms still occupy this uncertain status. The single-celled organism *Parakaryon myojinensis* has a position on the tree of life that is completely unknown. There is also "biological dark matter," which consists of genetic material from unidentified microorganisms that match no known species. In the world of insects, the frosted phoenix moth is so rare and obscure that it cannot be placed in any family within the Lepidoptera. Even ancient groups like the Ediacaran biota have an unclear position within Eukaryota. They might be related to fungi, algae, or perhaps even an entirely extinct kingdom.

Varanops BW
Varanops BW

The scale of this uncertainty is particularly large in the study of fungi. In 2022, the "Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa" reported approximately 3,185 genera as *incertae sedis*. This includes roughly 2,680 genera within the Ascomycota group and about 420 within the Basidiomycota group. Many of these fungi are well-described physically, yet they still do not match any recognized family or order. This backlog is caused by limited sampling and discordant signals from different genetic markers. As scientists continue to collect fresh samples and perform molecular studies, they will gradually move these mysteries from the "uncertain" box into their rightful places on the tree of life.

720 words

Where will your curiosity go next?

Keep exploring at your chosen reading level.

🖼️ Images & Media (4)
File:Colostethus ruthveni 350364947.jpg
Colostethus ruthveni 350364947.jpg
File:Gymnogyps californianus us fish 3.jpg
Gymnogyps californianus us fish 3.jpg
File:Plumalina plumaria Hall, 1858 (6.3 cm tall) in quartzose siltstone, weathered from the South Wales Member of the lower Perrysburg Formation (Canadaway Group, Upper Devonian) of western New York State, USA. (8473318685).jpg
Plumalina plumaria Hall, 1858 (6.3 cm...
File:Varanops BW.jpg
Varanops BW.jpg
More to explore

🔬 Go deeper

More advanced topics to explore

🪜 Step back

Simpler topics to build understanding

What is Nepedia?

A free, ad-free encyclopedia for children. Every article is written at five reading levels, so the same page works for a five-year-old and a fifteen-year-old — use the level switcher above to see this one change. No account needed to read.