Some people agree on rules. This is called Ijma. It helps many Muslims. They look for one answer. It can help them follow their faith. Do you like to agree with friends?
Some people agree on rules. This is called Ijma. It helps many Muslims. They use it to find answers for their faith.
Sunni Muslims use Ijma to help them. It comes after the Qur'an. It also comes after the Sunnah. This helps them make laws.
People wonder who should agree. Some say it is the first Muslims. Others say it is wise teachers. They may also say it is everyone.
Some think it is hard to get everyone to agree. Because of this, it is not used all the time. It is used to confirm a rule. This makes the rule strong.
If people do not agree, it is called ikhtilaf. This shows there are many ways to think. It is interesting to see how people decide together.
Ijma is an Arabic word. It means agreement. It refers to the consensus of the Muslim community on Islamic law. Sunni Muslims see it as a secondary source of law. It comes after the Qur'an and the Sunnah.
Many people wonder who should make this agreement. Some say it should only be the first Muslims. Others believe it is the consensus of wise scholars. Some think the whole Muslim world must agree. If only one person disagrees, there is no Ijma. This can be very hard to do in real life. Because of this, it is not used for every rule.
There are different ways to look at Ijma. Some call it ijma al-ummah, which is the whole community. Others call it ijma al-aimmah, which is the agreement of religious leaders. The Shia view of Ijma is different. The Mu'tazilite group does not use it as a source of law at all. If there is no agreement, it is called ikhtilaf. This shows that people have many different ideas about faith.
Ijma is an Arabic word that means consensus or agreement. In Islamic law, it refers to the community agreeing on a specific point. For Sunni Muslims, it is a secondary source of Sharia law. This means it comes after the Qur'an and the Sunnah.
The idea is that a shared agreement can turn a likely rule into a certain one. This belief comes from sayings called hadiths. One famous hadith says the community will never agree on an error. This gives the consensus a lot of weight and authority.
People have many different ideas about who counts as the community. Some believe only the Sahaba, the first generation of Muslims, can form an Ijma. Others think the first three generations, known as the Salaf, are the right group. Some scholars say it is the agreement of all religious lawyers and experts. This is often called scholarly consensus. Other views suggest the entire Muslim world must agree. This would include both learned scholars and regular people.
History shows that different thinkers had very different rules for Ijma. Imam Al-Shafi'i believed the whole Muslim community had to agree. This meant if one person out of millions disagreed, there was no consensus. To make this easier, Al-Ghazali suggested a different way. He said the community agrees on big religious principles. However, only the learned scholars need to agree on the tiny details.
This helped make the idea more practical for real life.
Scholars also look to the Qur'an to prove that Ijma is valid. Imam Al-Shafi'i once studied the whole Qur'an three times to find proof. He found a verse in Surah An-Nisa that mentions the way of those of faith. Other verses in Surah Luqman and Surah An-Nisa also provide support. Some thinkers even look at Surah Al Fatihah for indirect support.
These verses help explain why following the community matters.
Not every group uses Ijma in the same way. For example, the Shia view of Ijma is often described as ambiguous. In the past, the authority of Imams made consensus less important for them. The Mu'tazilite group does not use consensus as a source of law at all. They felt the first generation of Muslims had flaws in their thinking.
When there is no agreement, it is called ikhtilaf. This shows how many different paths exist in religious thought.
Ijma is an Arabic term that refers to consensus or agreement. In the context of Islamic law, it describes the collective agreement of the Muslim community on a specific legal point. For Sunni Muslims, Ijma serves as a secondary source of Sharia law. It follows the divine revelation of the Qur'an and the Sunnah, which is the prophetic practice of Muhammad.
The primary purpose of Ijma is to provide legal certainty. In theory, a consensus can elevate a ruling based on probable evidence into a state of absolute certainty. This makes it a vital tool for interpreting religious law when direct answers are not found in the primary texts.
The authority of Ijma is rooted in classical Islamic doctrine and specific religious texts. Sunni scholars often point to a series of hadiths, which are sayings of the Prophet Muhammad. One prominent hadith states that the ummah, or the Muslim community, will never collude en-masse upon an error. This belief suggests that the community's collective wisdom acts as a safeguard against mistakes. Because of this, the consensus of the community is seen as a way to certify the truth.
This concept is central to how Sunni jurisprudence functions as a system of law.
There is significant debate regarding which specific group constitutes the "community" required to reach a consensus. Different schools of Islamic jurisprudence offer various definitions. Some thinkers argue that only the Sahaba, the first generation of Muslims, possess this authority. Others believe the consensus of the Salaf, which includes the first three generations, is what matters. A third view focuses on scholarly consensus, which involves the agreement of all competent jurists or religious lawyers.
Finally, some suggest that Ijma requires the agreement of the entire Muslim world, including both scholars and lay people.
History shows how these definitions evolved to meet practical needs. Imam Al-Shafi'i held a very strict view of Ijma. He believed that for a consensus to be religiously binding, it had to include the entire Muslim community globally. Under this rule, if even one person out of millions disagreed, a consensus could not be reached. To make the concept more functional, the scholar Al-Ghazali proposed a distinction. He suggested that the whole community must agree on major religious principles. However, he argued that only the religiously learned need to agree on finer, more technical details.
Scholars also seek validation for Ijma within the verses of the Qur'an. Imam Al-Shafi'i famously searched for this proof by reciting the entire Qur'an three times. He eventually identified a verse in Surah An-Nisa that mentions "the way of those of faith." This passage is seen by many as a direct reference to the importance of following the community. Other supporting verses are found in Surah Luqman and Surah An-Nisa. Some scholars even find indirect support in Surah Al-Fatihah, which Muslims recite many times during their daily Salah.
Different Islamic sects and groups view the role of Ijma in very different ways. For the Shia, the status of Ijma is often described as ambiguous. In early Imami Shia Islam, the authority of the Imams made the idea of community consensus less central. The Mu'tazilite sect takes an even different approach. They do not consider consensus to be a valid source of law at all. This is because they held rationalist criticisms of the first generation of Muslims. They believed those early leaders possessed intellects that were not perfect.
In practice, the application of Ijma has its own limitations and complexities. While the theory is powerful, the difficulty of finding and proving a total agreement meant it had little impact on some legal developments. Instead, a more pragmatic form of consensus was often used. This involved consulting the works of prominent jurists to confirm a ruling so it could not be reopened. Interestingly, cases that reached a formal consensus account for less than 1 percent of classical jurisprudence. When there is a lack of consensus on a point of law, the situation is known as ikhtilaf.
More to explore
✨ What else?
Related topics you might enjoy
🔬 Go deeper
More advanced topics to explore
🪜 Step back
Simpler topics to build understanding
What is Nepedia?
A free, ad-free encyclopedia for children. Every article is written at five reading levels, so the same page works for a five-year-old and a fifteen-year-old — use the level switcher above to see this one change. No account needed to read.