People look for facts to solve crimes. 

People look for facts to solve crimes. 

A criminal investigation is a way to find facts. 


Some workers use the "MMO" rule to find suspects. This stands for means, motive, and opportunity. Means means having the tools to do a crime. Motive means having a reason, like money. Opportunity means being at the scene at the right time. If someone has an alibi, they may not be a suspect.
Sometimes, investigators must choose which crimes to study first. This can be hard if they have little money. Some experts worry that focusing on certain groups can hide other crimes. They think new ways might help find more truth.
A criminal investigation is a way to find facts. 

This work is actually a very ancient science. It may have roots in the Code of Hammurabi. In that code, people could present their own evidence. This applied to both the accuser and the accused. Later, the English constable became a professional investigator. Around 1250 CE, constables had a specific job. They were told to record matters of fact. They were not supposed to judge the law. 
Investigators often use three special indicators called MMO. This helps them find potential suspects. The first part is means, which involves tools. It also includes a person's physical capabilities. The second part is motive, or a reason. This might be for money or revenge. The third part is opportunity, or being there. This means being at the crime scene during the crime. 
Sometimes, investigators must decide which crimes are most important. This is hard when they have limited budgets. Some experts worry about how they choose priorities. They look at the demographics of certain crimes. For example, more women joined terror groups recently. This changed the priority of those investigations. Some criminologists worry that profiling can hide real crimes. They think investigators might ignore certain types of complaints. This happens if they think a group is unlikely to commit a crime.
There are many ideas to fix these problems. Some people want to hire more police officers. Others suggest using randomized priorities for suspects. This could help find criminals who are currently unsuspected. Randomizing might also save money for the police. Those savings could go toward technical evidence or tracking. This would help investigators find people who are hiding. It might also help them handle more complaints. 
Criminal investigation is an applied science used to uncover facts. These facts are essential for informing criminal trials in a court of law. 
This field of study is actually an ancient science. Some of its roots may go back to the Code of Hammurabi. This was an ancient set of laws. In that code, both the accuser and the accused had rights. They both had the right to present the evidence they collected. 
Today, most criminal investigations are performed by government police forces. However, people also hire private investigators to help or complete investigations. Some investigators use on-site methods that are nicknamed "shoe leather" work. To find potential suspects, many organizations use three indicators of suspicion. These are known together by the acronym MMO. 
The first indicator is means, which refers to the tools or physical capabilities needed. The second indicator is motive, which is the reason for the crime. This could be for financial gain or to seek revenge. The third indicator is opportunity, which means being at the crime scene during the offense. Investigators also look for relationships between the victim and potential offenders. If a person presents a valid alibi, they may be eliminated from suspicion.
Investigative work can face challenges regarding how tasks are prioritized. Law enforcement agencies often deal with limited budgets. This can lead to problems with investigation priority bias. Some criminologists have noticed changes in the demographic composition of certain crimes. For example, the percentage of women convicted for joining terrorist organizations has increased. In some jurisdictions, women are now in the 40 to 50 percent range. This is a change from much lower percentages seen in crimes like murder or rape.
Some experts worry that profiling can lead to self-fulfilling prophecies in statistics. They theorize that investigators might rely on the statistical likelihood of certain groups. This might cause them to ignore complaints filed by people they consider unlikely offenders. Even a small difference in crime likelihood can be hidden by large differences in conviction rates. This can result in criminals not being caught because they were profiled as unlikely suspects. 
There are several proposed solutions to address these priority problems. Some people suggest that increasing the number of police officers would help. Other experts argue that investigating evidence is more expensive than police patrols. They suggest that not all crimes can be investigated due to costs. One idea is to replace profiling with randomized priorities for suspects. This would apply to individuals within similar types of crime. This randomization could expose unsuspected criminals to the risk of being punished.
Using randomization might also lead to significant monetary savings. These savings could be used for more technical work. For instance, money could go toward investigating technical evidence or tracking criminals who are hiding. This could reduce the need to ignore complaints because of budget limits. By focusing on these areas, the entire system of criminal investigation can become more effective. It allows the science of finding facts to work more broadly across society.
🖼️ Images & Media (3)
More to explore
✨ What else?
Related topics you might enjoy
🪜 Step back
Simpler topics to build understanding
What is Nepedia?
A free, ad-free encyclopedia for children. Every article is written at five reading levels, so the same page works for a five-year-old and a fifteen-year-old — use the level switcher above to see this one change. No account needed to read.