Nepedia
Back to Discover
Advanced Reader
📖

Protoscience

philosophy religion Maturity 11-13 Next article →

Protoscience is a term used in the philosophy of science. It describes a research field that is still undeveloped. Such a field might eventually grow into an established science. Philosophers use this concept to study the history of science. It also helps them distinguish protoscience from both science and pseudoscience. The word is a hybrid of Greek and Latin roots. It combines "proto-" with "scientia." This translates to a first or primeval form of rational knowledge.

To understand protoscience, we must look at how cognitive fields work. A cognitive field is a community of people with a shared domain of inquiry. These fields include a specific worldview and various logical or mathematical tools. They also possess background knowledge from neighboring fields. Cognitive fields are divided into two main types: belief fields and research fields. Research fields change over time because of active investigation. Examples include mathematics, medicine, and the social sciences. Belief fields, such as religion or political ideology, do not change through research. Instead, they change due to social or political pressures.

A science field is a specific type of research field. It must satisfy 12 distinct conditions to be considered a full science. These conditions include having a research community with special training. The researchers must have the autonomy to pursue their work. Their worldview must focus on the real world and its laws. They must also use up-to-date logical and mathematical tools. They must investigate real objects and use testable theories. Protoscience is defined as an incomplete or approximate science field. Mario Bunge described it as a field that partially satisfies these 12 conditions. Raimo Tuomela suggested a protoscience satisfies exactly 9 of the 12 conditions.

Philosophers have identified different stages in the development of science. Mario Bunge proposed a five-stage process. The first stage is prescience, which involves unchecked speculation. The second stage is protoscience. In this stage, people have hypotheses and make observations. They might use occasional measurements, but they do not conduct experiments. The third stage is deuteroscience. This stage involves mathematical hypotheses and systematic measurement. The fourth stage is tritoscience, which uses mathematical models and experiments. The final stage is tetartoscience. This stage features comprehensive theories and precise, systematic experiments.

The history of protoscience as a research field began in the early 20th century. In 1910, a thinker named Jones used the term to describe political economy. He believed economics was on its way to becoming a science. Thomas Kuhn later provided a more detailed description. He saw protoscience as a field that generates testable conclusions. However, he noted these fields face incessant criticism. They often struggle to progress as quickly as established sciences. Kuhn applied this idea to medicine and natural philosophy. He noted that many past crafts eventually became established sciences.

There are many historical examples of protoscience. Alchemy is a classic example that preceded modern chemistry. Alfred Wegener’s original theory of continental drift was also protoscience. Even ancient astronomical studies were forms of protoscience. Early people recorded astronomical images on stones, bones, and cave walls. In the 17th and 18th centuries, Luigi Ferdinando Marsili studied ocean currents. This work contributed to the protoscience of oceanography. Even ancient philosophers like Anaximander practiced a form of protoscience. He viewed the earth as a free-floating cylinder in space.

Protoscience also connects to the idea of "thought collectives." Ludwik Fleck argued that researchers are influenced by their environment. He called this influence a "thought style." This means a researcher's perception is shaped by their specific culture. Because of this, a "fact" might be relative to a specific collective. A fact might be verifiable in one group but not in another. Fleck believed that scientific progress requires changing old concepts and methods. This change is difficult because collectives can become blind to new ideas. Cooperation between different collectives can help trigger these necessary changes.

645 words

Where will your curiosity go next?

Keep exploring at your chosen reading level.

More to explore

🔬 Go deeper

More advanced topics to explore

🪜 Step back

Simpler topics to build understanding

What is Nepedia?

A free, ad-free encyclopedia for children. Every article is written at five reading levels, so the same page works for a five-year-old and a fifteen-year-old — use the level switcher above to see this one change. No account needed to read.