A promise is a special word. It means you will do something. You might link pinkies to show it. 
A promise is when you say you will do something. 

In law, a promise can be a contract. This is a deal that the law must follow. If someone breaks a deal, they may pay money.
Many religions have rules for promises. For example, some Muslims believe God sees every promise. Breaking an oath can be a sin. People might fast to make up for it.
Some thinkers wonder if promises should always be kept. Others think it is okay to break them sometimes. It is a big thing to think about.
A promise is a commitment to do or not do something. 
Some promises are very formal. People use vows in marriage or military oaths. 
Many religions have rules about promises. In Islam, God is a witness to every promise. Breaking an oath can be a sin. A person might fast for three days to make up for it. In some Christian groups, people do not take oaths. They believe all promises are seen by God.
Thinkers also study promises. Immanuel Kant said we should always keep promises. Other thinkers believe it is okay to break them sometimes. They think it depends on the situation. This is a big idea for many people to think about.
A promise is a commitment to do or not do something in the future. 
In the world of law, promises can become binding contracts. 
Many different types of promises exist in our daily lives. Some are very solemn, like marriage vows or military oaths. 
Religions around the world have special views on promises. In Christian theology, some see the Holy Spirit as a fulfilled promise from Jesus. Some Christian groups, like the Mennonites, choose not to take oaths or affirmations. They believe all promises are witnessed by God. In Islam, the Quran says Muslims should not break their promises. Allah is seen as the witness and guarantor of every promise. If a Muslim breaks an oath, they may need to ask for forgiveness. They might also feed ten poor people or fast for three days to make up for it.
Philosophers have spent a long time studying the rules of promises. Immanuel Kant believed that people should always keep their promises. Other thinkers, called consequentialists, argue that breaking a promise might be okay if it helps more people. In 2008, Iain King suggested a middle ground for making good decisions. He said a promise should be kept unless a new, unexpected situation arises that is more important. This shows that deciding whether to keep a promise can be a very hard job. People must use good judgment to find the best path for everyone involved.
A promise is a formal commitment to act or refrain from acting in a specific way. 

In the legal field, promises often form the basis of binding contracts. This process typically follows a specific sequence of offer and acceptance. An offeror makes a proposal to an offeree, indicating a desire to be legally bound. Once the offeree accepts the terms in the manner indicated, a contract is created. This results in a voluntarily assumed legal obligation for both parties. If one party fails to meet these obligations, it is called a breach of contract. The party in breach may be liable to provide compensation. 
Legal compensation aims to restore the promisee to their original position. For example, if a seller fails to deliver a car sold for $10,000, they must compensate the buyer. If the market price of a similar car rises by 10%, the seller might owe $1,000. If the buyer had already paid a $5,000 deposit, they would receive that money back plus the $1,000. Contracts can be bilateral, involving mutual undertakings from both sides. They can also be unilateral, where only one party is obligated to act. In a unilateral contract, a person might promise payment only if a specific task is completed.
Promises vary significantly in their social and formal weight. Solemn promises include marriage vows or military oaths, which are often considered conventions. There are also election promises made by political candidates. These pledges are often shaped later by politics and the need for individual cooperation. Some thinkers describe "fairy tale promises" as those that are regrettable but must be honored. In sociology, thinkers like C. Wright Mills discuss the ideological promises society makes to individuals. The American Dream is often cited as a popular example of this social commitment.
Religion provides various frameworks for understanding the sanctity of a promise. In Christian theology, the Holy Spirit is viewed as the fulfillment of a promise from Jesus. Some Christian groups, such as the Mennonites, refuse to take oaths or affirmations. They believe all promises are witnessed by God based on the Sermon on the Mount. In Islam, the Quran forbids breaking promises after they are confirmed. Allah is regarded as the witness and guarantor of these commitments. If a Muslim breaks an oath, they may perform acts of atonement. 
Islam offers specific methods for making up for a broken oath. A person might feed or clothe ten poor people to seek forgiveness. If those options are not possible, they may fast for three days. Breaking a promise to harm a relationship when the other person seeks peace is also considered a serious matter. These religious views emphasize that a promise is not just a social contract, but a spiritual one. The weight of the promise is tied to the presence of a divine witness.
Philosophers have debated the moral rules that should govern our commitments. Immanuel Kant argued that promises should always be kept without exception. In contrast, consequentialists believe promises can be broken if it yields greater benefits. In 2008, Iain King proposed a way to reconcile these two views. He suggested that a promise should be kept unless a new, unforeseen situation arises. This new situation must be more important than the original promise itself. This requires individuals to use careful judgment to maximize benefits for everyone.
Psychology also examines the mechanics of how promises function in the mind. Researchers compare promises to threats to understand their impact on human behavior. While both are controlled by the speaker, they have different "valences." A promise is generally viewed as a positive prospective action. A threat is viewed as a negative prospective action, often intended to influence behavior through punishment. Both concepts rely heavily on magnitude and credibility. The perceived strength of a promise determines how likely a person is to comply with it.
🖼️ Images & Media (4)
More to explore
✨ What else?
Related topics you might enjoy
What is Nepedia?
A free, ad-free encyclopedia for children. Every article is written at five reading levels, so the same page works for a five-year-old and a fifteen-year-old — use the level switcher above to see this one change. No account needed to read.