Nepedia
Back to Discover
Fluent Reader
📖

Plessy v. Ferguson

society Maturity 11-13 social justice Next article →

This article covers sensitive topics: social_justice. Parents can manage visibility in Parental Controls.

Plessy v. Ferguson was a very important Supreme Court case from 1896. This decision changed how laws worked in the United States for many years. The Court ruled that racial segregation laws were allowed. They said these laws did not break the U.S. Constitution. This was true as long as the facilities for each race were equal. People called this new rule "separate but equal."

JimCrowCar2
JimCrowCar2

The story began because of a law in Louisiana. In 1890, the state passed the Separate Car Act. This law forced Black and white passengers to use different train cars. The law said train officers must assign people to cars based on their race. It said this was done to keep passengers comfortable. If someone sat in the wrong car, they could face a fine or jail.

JimCrowCar2
JimCrowCar2

A group called the Comité des Citoyens wanted to fight this law. They chose a man named Homer Plessy to help them. Plessy was a man of mixed race. On June 7, 1892, he boarded a "Whites Only" train car in New Orleans. He did this to test the law in court. Plessy was arrested and taken to trial in Orleans Parish. His lawyers argued that the law was unconstitutional.

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown
Portrait of Henry Billings Brown

The case eventually reached the U.S. Supreme Court in 1896. The Court issued a 7–1 decision against Plessy. Justice Henry Billings Brown wrote the main opinion for the majority. The Court said the law did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. They believed the amendment guaranteed legal equality but not social equality. The Court felt states had the power to make laws for safety and morals. They did not think the law made Black people inferior.

Portrait of Henry Billings Brown
Portrait of Henry Billings Brown

One judge did not agree with the others. Justice John Marshall Harlan was the only one to vote against the decision. He was often called the "Great Dissenter." Harlan argued that the Constitution should be "color-blind." He believed the law should not treat people differently based on race. He predicted this decision would become very famous for the wrong reasons. Later, other cases like Brown v. Board of Education helped change these rules.

JudgeJMHarlan
JudgeJMHarlan
Negro drinking at "Colored" water cooler in streetcar terminal, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma by Russell Lee
Negro drinking at "Colored" water cooler in streetcar terminal, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma by Russell Lee
354 words

Where will your curiosity go next?

Keep exploring at your chosen reading level.

🖼️ Images & Media (4)
File:Portrait of Henry Billings Brown.jpg
Portrait of Henry Billings Brown.jpg
File:JudgeJMHarlan.jpg
JudgeJMHarlan.jpg
File:Negro drinking at "Colored" water cooler in streetcar terminal, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma by Russell Lee.jpg
Negro drinking at "Colored" water cooler...
File:JimCrowCar2.jpg
JimCrowCar2.jpg
More to explore

What is Nepedia?

A free, ad-free encyclopedia for children. Every article is written at five reading levels, so the same page works for a five-year-old and a fifteen-year-old — use the level switcher above to see this one change. No account needed to read.