Some people have big ideas about a country. 
Some people have big ideas about a country. 
A man named Savarkar wrote about it. He said it was about a shared way of life. He did not mean it was just about religion. 
He thought people should share a common land. He also thought they should share a common culture. This helped build a big idea for the nation.
Other groups use these same ideas today. Some people think these ideas are good. Others think they can divide people.
It is a very big topic in India. Many people still talk about it today.
Hindutva is a political idea in India. It focuses on Hindu nationalism. This means making the nation follow Hindu values. 
A man named Vinayak Damodar Savarkar wrote about it in 1922. He wrote a book called Essentials of Hindutva. He said Hindutva was not just about religion. He said it was about a shared culture. He also said it was about a shared land. He believed people should share a common race. 
Savarkar wanted to build a strong Hindu nation. He felt this would make the country better. Other leaders like M. S. Golwalkar also shared these views. They spoke about a Hindu Nation.
Today, many groups use these ideas. One group is the RSS. Another group is the BJP. These groups want Hindu culture to lead India.
Some people disagree with these ideas. They say Hindutva can divide people. They worry it hurts the many different groups in India. The Supreme Court of India has looked at these ideas. In 1966, the court said Hinduism is hard to define. They called it a way of life. This is still a big debate in India today.
Hindutva is a political idea used in India. It focuses on Hindu nationalism. This means people want the nation to follow Hindu values. 
This idea works by grouping people together through shared traits. Vinayak Damodar Savarkar was the main person who wrote about it. He said Hindutva was about three main things. These were a common nation, a common race, and a common culture. 
Savarkar began writing his ideas in the early 1920s. He wrote a famous book in 1923 called Essentials of Hindutva. Before him, the word Hindutva was used in different ways. In the late 1890s, a man named Chandranath Basu used it to describe Hindu culture. Later, Savarkar gave the word a much wider political meaning. He wanted to define a specific identity for the people of India.
There are many important names and groups tied to this movement. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, or RSS, is a major group that uses these ideas. Another group is the Vishva Hindu Parishad, or VHP. The current ruling party in India is the Bharatiya Janata Party, or BJP. These groups are often called the Sangh Parivar.
This topic is linked to how laws work in India. The Supreme Court of India has looked at Hindutva many times. In 1966, the court said that Hinduism is very hard to define. They said it is more like a "way of life" than just a religion. This decision has caused many debates. Some people worry these ideas divide people. Others believe they help define the nation's character.
Hindutva is a political ideology centered on Hindu nationalism in India. It seeks to establish Hindu hegemony, or leadership, within the country. This means shaping the political and cultural landscape around Hindu values. 
The term Hindutva is a Sanskrit word. It translates to "Hinduness." It first appeared among Bengali intellectuals during the British colonial era. These intellectuals used it to discuss Indic religions. They wanted to address Western ideas about what religion should be. In the late 1890s, Chandranath Basu used the term to describe traditional Hindu culture. However, the word later took on a much broader political meaning. This change happened through the work of specific political thinkers. They transformed a cultural term into a tool for nation-building.
Vinayak Damodar Savarkar was the primary architect of modern Hindutva. He formulated his ideology in 1922. In his 1923 book, *Essentials of Hindutva*, he defined the concept. For Savarkar, Hindutva was not just about religious rituals. He made a distinction between Hinduism and Hindutva. He believed Hindutva concerned the national character of India. He defined three essential pillars for this identity. These were a common nation (*rashtra*), a common race (*jati*), and a common culture (*sanskriti*). 
Savarkar’s definition of a "Hindu" was based on geography and ethnicity. He viewed the term as inclusive of all Indic religions. This included Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism. He believed these groups shared a common culture and a love for the land. He used the words "Hindu" and "Sindhu" interchangeably. To Savarkar, a Hindu was someone living between the Himalayas and the Indian Ocean. He emphasized a shared ancestry and a common origin. This approach moved the focus from religious practice to ethnic and cultural identity. 
Savarkar developed these ideas in response to specific historical events. He reacted to the Khilafat movement, which was a pan-Islamic mobilization. This movement saw Indian Muslims supporting the Ottoman Empire's Caliph. Because of this, Savarkar’s writings showed deep hostility toward Islam. He viewed Islamic ideology as a threat to the "Hindu Rashtra," or Hindu Nation. He believed Muslims were a greater threat to the nation than the British. This perspective helped shape the movement's focus on creating a unified Hindu identity. It also led to the exclusion of those who did not share this specific cultural history.
Other leaders helped expand these ideas. M. S. Golwalkar was the second chief of the RSS. He was a very influential thinker in the movement. He helped promote the concept of the "Hindu Rashtra." 
The legal system in India has also engaged with these definitions. In 1966, the Supreme Court of India ruled on the nature of Hinduism. Chief Justice P. B. Gajendragadkar stated that Hinduism is impossible to define. The court suggested it is a complex "way of life." In the 1990s, several "Hindutva judgments" were delivered. These rulings characterized Hindutva as a "state of mind" rather than a political doctrine. These decisions have been controversial. Some lawyers argue they blur the line between religion and politics. Others argue they allow politicians to use majoritarian themes without breaking electoral laws.
Today, Hindutva remains a powerful force in Indian politics. It connects religious identity with national pride. It has influenced how the country views its own history and culture.
🖼️ Images & Media (3)
More to explore
✨ What else?
Related topics you might enjoy
🪜 Step back
Simpler topics to build understanding
What is Nepedia?
A free, ad-free encyclopedia for children. Every article is written at five reading levels, so the same page works for a five-year-old and a fifteen-year-old — use the level switcher above to see this one change. No account needed to read.