Some people have very strong ideas. They may not agree with most others. These ideas are far from the middle. This can be for good or bad. Some people use these ideas to help. Do you think being strong is good?
Some people have very strong ideas. These ideas are far from the middle. People may call these views extreme.
Some people use extreme ideas to do good. They might fight for love or justice. Other people use them to cause harm.
Groups can be extreme in many ways. Some groups use peace to reach goals. Other groups use violence.
Being extreme can happen for many reasons. Some people feel very upset or sad. They may feel they are not heard.
It is important to be kind to others. We should listen even when we disagree. What do you think is best?
Extremism means having views that are far from the middle. Most people live in the mainstream. This means they hold ideas that most others share. Extremists hold ideas that are very different.
Some people use the word to mean something bad. They might use it to label groups they do not like. But others use the word just to describe a way of thinking. It can be about politics or religion.
Extremist groups can act in different ways. Some use nonviolent ways to reach their goals. Other groups use violence. Some groups may target people or buildings.
Why do people become extreme? Some researchers say it is about how people feel. They might feel sad, angry, or treated unfairly. A 2018 study found that people with extreme views may find it hard to change their minds. They may feel very sure they are right, even with new facts.
Not all extreme ideas are bad. Martin Luther King Jr. was called an extremist. He used that idea to fight for love and justice. He believed it was important to choose the right kind of extreme.
Extremism describes views or actions that are far from the middle. Most people follow mainstream ideas that many others share. Extremists hold beliefs that are far outside these normal social views. This can happen in politics, religion, or even economics.
Some people use the word to criticize others. However, researchers often use it just to describe how a group thinks. It is a way to show how far an idea sits from the center.
How people see extremism depends on their own values. One person might see an action as a brave fight for freedom. Another person might see that same action as scary terrorism.
Power also changes how we label these actions. People in low-power groups often use direct violence to be heard. They might feel that normal ways to change things are blocked for them. Stronger groups might use different ways to stay in power. They might use rules or police to control others.
Many writers have studied these ideas over the years. In the mid-20th century, Eric Hoffer wrote about people in mass movements. He wrote books like The True Believer to explain their minds. Arthur Schlesinger Jr. wrote The Vital Center to talk about middle-ground politics.
He believed societies need clear lines for what is acceptable. Other thinkers, like Seymour Martin Lipset, looked at how different sides act. He even suggested that extremism could exist in the center of politics.
Scientists look for patterns in how extremists think and feel. A 2018 study at University College London found something interesting. People with extreme views on the left or right had harder times with metacognition. This is the ability to see when you are wrong.
These people often felt very sure of their own ideas. A 2019 study found four common traits in these groups. They often feel distress and see the world in black and white. They may also feel too confident and struggle to accept different opinions.
Not all extreme views are seen as bad by everyone. Martin Luther King Jr. was once called an extremist. He felt this label could be a good thing if used for love.
He asked if Jesus or Amos were not extremists for justice. Barry Goldwater also said that defending liberty can be extreme. Robert F. Kennedy noted that the real danger is being intolerant. These leaders showed that being extreme can be about fighting for what is right.
Extremism describes the state of holding views or taking measures that are far outside the social mainstream. This concept is most often applied to political or religious ideologies. It can also be used to describe extreme views in economics. People use the term in different ways. Some use it as a criticism, which is called a pejorative use. Others, like journalists or academics, use it as a neutral description. In many discussions, extremist views are contrasted with those held by moderates.
Defining extremism is a complex task because it is often subjective. Peter T. Coleman and Andrea Bartoli note that it involves beliefs, attitudes, and actions far from the ordinary. What one person calls a moral act, another might call immoral. For example, one person might see a group as "freedom fighters." Another person might label that same group as "terrorists." This depends on a person's own values and politics. Even views on historical figures can change based on new information or shifting world opinions.
Power dynamics play a major role in how extremism is identified. Low-power groups often use direct, episodic violence, such as suicide bombings. They may turn to these methods if they feel normal ways to engage in conflict are blocked. On the other hand, dominant groups may use structural or institutionalized forms of extremism. This can include the covert use of torture or the informal sanctioning of police brutality. In Germany, the government uses the term specifically to identify intentions that reject democratic values and laws.
Extremism is different from radicalism in several specific ways. Researcher Astrid Bötticher notes that these two concepts have different goals and morals. Radicalism is often seen as idealistic or emancipatory. Extremism may be viewed as restorative or anti-democratic. While radicals might use pragmatic and selective violence, extremists may view violence as a legitimate and acceptable tool. Furthermore, radicals may show an acceptance of diversity, whereas extremists might show disdain for it.
Many thinkers have attempted to explain the nature of political extremism. In the mid-20th century, Eric Hoffer wrote about the psychology of people in fanatical mass movements. He published works like "The True Believer." During the same era, Arthur Schlesinger Jr. wrote "The Vital Center." He argued that societies need a mainstream middle ground to function. Another thinker, Seymour Martin Lipset, suggested that extremism can even exist in the center of politics. This center-based extremism was linked to the rise of fascism.
Psychologists have identified specific traits that often appear in extremist groups. Jan-Willem van Prooijen identified four features: psychological distress, cognitive simplicity, overconfidence, and intolerance. A 2018 study at University College London looked at metacognition in political extremists. Metacognition is the ability to recognize when you are wrong and change your mind. The study found that people on both the extreme left and right had worse metacognition. They often had misplaced confidence in their beliefs and resisted new evidence.
Some leaders have argued that the label of extremist is not always negative. Martin Luther King Jr. was once called an extremist. He responded by asking if figures like Jesus or Amos were not extremists for love and justice. He suggested the real question is whether one is an extremist for hate or for love. Similarly, Barry Goldwater stated that defending liberty can be an extreme act. Robert F. Kennedy argued that the danger is not being extreme, but being intolerant of others.
Finally, the term can be used by governments to control speech. In Russia, laws against extremist content have been used to suppress protests and criticism. This includes prosecuting people for writing poems or criticizing government spending. This shows how the definition of extremism can be a tool for political power. Whether viewed as a psychological illness or a rational strategy for power, extremism remains a central topic in understanding how societies function and conflict.
Where will your curiosity go next?
More to explore
✨ What else?
Related topics you might enjoy
🔬 Go deeper
More advanced topics to explore
🪜 Step back
Simpler topics to build understanding
What is Nepedia?
A free, ad-free encyclopedia for children. Every article is written at five reading levels, so the same page works for a five-year-old and a fifteen-year-old — use the level switcher above to see this one change. No account needed to read.