Nepedia
Back to Discover
Advanced Reader
⚛️

Unbihexium

physical science Maturity 11-13 Next article →

Unbihexium is a hypothetical chemical element that has not yet been discovered or confirmed. Scientists refer to it by the temporary IUPAC name unbihexium and the placeholder symbol Ubh. It is also known as element 126 or eka-plutonium. In the periodic table, unbihexium is expected to be a g-block superactinide. It would also be the eighth element in the eighth period. This element is a major focus for nuclear physicists. They study it to understand the properties of superheavy elements.

Next proton shell
Next proton shell

Physicists are interested in unbihexium because of a concept called the island of stability. This theory suggests that certain superheavy nuclei might last much longer than others. Stability in an atom is often linked to "magic numbers" of protons or neutrons. A magic number occurs when a shell of particles is completely filled. For unbihexium, the atomic number 126 might be a magic number for protons. Some specific isotopes, like 310Ubh or 354Ubh, might also have magic numbers of neutrons. These filled shells could lead to much longer half-lives for these specific atoms.

Nuclear chart from KTUY model
Nuclear chart from KTUY model

There are different scientific models regarding where this stability actually exists. Some models predict that the island of stability is centered near unbihexium. Other researchers believe the island may lie at lower atomic numbers. They suggest it might be closer to elements like copernicium or flerovium. These different predictions change how scientists search for these atoms. Some models even suggest that unbihexium might be very unstable. For example, some calculations show that 310Ubh is very neutron-deficient. This could cause it to decay through alpha decay or spontaneous fission in less than a microsecond.

Attempts to create unbihexium have a long history. The first attempt to synthesize the element occurred in 1971 at CERN. Researchers René Bimbot and John M. Alexander used a process called hot fusion. They attempted to combine nuclei to form unbihexium, but they found no atoms. They did observe high-energy alpha particles during the experiment. At the time, these were taken as possible evidence for success. However, later studies suggested the experiment was not sensitive enough. It is now considered highly unlikely that they formed unbihexium nuclei.

Next proton shell
Next proton shell

Scientists have also searched for unbihexium in nature. In 1976, a group of American researchers proposed that superheavy elements might exist in minerals. They suggested these elements could cause unexplained radiation damage called radiohalos. A professor named Tom Cahill claimed to detect alpha particles and X-rays that supported this idea. However, other scientists questioned these findings. They argued that the necessary neutron counts would make the nuclei unstable. There was also a theory that the radiation came from natural cerium. Today, the existence of such primordial elements in Earth's minerals remains uncertain.

Nuclear chart from KTUY model
Nuclear chart from KTUY model

If unbihexium were found in nature, it would likely behave like plutonium. This is because the two elements are predicted to have similar valence configurations. This means they would share similar chemical properties and oxidation states. Unbihexium is predicted to be a chemically active superactinide. It could exhibit many different oxidation states, ranging from +1 to +8. It might be found in rare earth minerals like bastnäsite or monazite. However, the difficulty of finding unbihexium is increased by the rarity of plutonium in those same minerals. If plutonium is not present, identifying unbihexium becomes much harder.

Next proton shell
Next proton shell

Synthesizing unbihexium in a laboratory will be an immense challenge. Current technology is already approaching its limits with the heaviest known elements. For example, making tennessine required a six-month experiment with an intense beam of calcium-48. Future experiments will likely need specialized facilities like the SHE-factory at JINR or RIKEN. These facilities allow for longer run times and better detection. Some scientists believe that standard fusion-evaporation reactions may not work for element 126. They may need to use heavier projectiles or different types of nuclear reactions. Even with better equipment, the tiny probability of success remains a major obstacle.

651 words

Where will your curiosity go next?

Keep exploring at your chosen reading level.

🖼️ Images & Media (2)
File:Nuclear chart from KTUY model.svg
Nuclear chart from KTUY model.svg
File:Next proton shell.svg
Next proton shell.svg
More to explore

🪜 Step back

Simpler topics to build understanding

What is Nepedia?

A free, ad-free encyclopedia for children. Every article is written at five reading levels, so the same page works for a five-year-old and a fifteen-year-old — use the level switcher above to see this one change. No account needed to read.