Log in Sign up
Back to Discover
📖

Scorched earth

society Maturity 9-11 war conflict
This article covers sensitive topics: war_conflict. Parents can manage visibility in Parental Controls.

In wars, some people use a hard plan. They destroy food and homes. This stops the other side from fighting. It can be very sad for many people. Many leaders have done this long ago. Do you think it is a good plan?

57 words

In wars, some people use a hard plan. They destroy food and homes. This stops the other side from fighting.

They might burn crops in a field. They might even break tools. This makes it hard for enemies to live.

Sherman railroad destroy noborder crop.jpg
Sherman railroad destroy noborder crop.jpg

Some leaders did this a long time ago. One leader lived in Scotland. He broke castles so they could not be used.

Corfe Castke 57.JPG
Corfe Castke 57.JPG

Other groups burned things to stay safe. They wanted to stop an attack. This was a very sad time for many.

It is a plan used to win wars.

113 words

A scorched-earth policy is a plan used in war. An army destroys things to stop an enemy from fighting. They might burn crops or food. They might destroy water or tools. This makes it hard for the enemy to live or move.

Some armies use this when they are leaving a place. They want to leave nothing useful for the army that follows. Other armies use it to stop an enemy from taking over.

Sherman railroad destroy noborder crop.jpg
Sherman railroad destroy noborder crop.jpg

Many leaders used this plan in history. Long ago, the Scythians destroyed food to stop the Persians. In the 11th century, William the Conqueror used it in England. His men burned villages to stop a rebellion. This was very hard for the people living there.

Robert the Bruce stipple engraving.jpg
Robert the Bruce stipple engraving.jpg

In Scotland, Robert the Bruce used a similar way. He broke his own castles. This is called slighting. It made the castles useless to the English.

Corfe Castke 57.JPG
Corfe Castke 57.JPG

Today, rules exist to help people. The 1977 Geneva Conventions say you cannot use this against civilians. This rule helps protect people who are not fighting.

198 words

A scorched-earth policy is a specific military strategy used during wars. The main goal is to destroy everything that helps an enemy fight. This includes destroying food, water, and plants. Armies might also destroy tools and buildings like roads or bridges.

Sherman railroad destroy noborder crop.jpg
Sherman railroad destroy noborder crop.jpg
Some armies use this when they are retreating from a battle. They want to leave nothing behind for the enemy to use. Other armies use it to stop an enemy from moving forward.

This strategy works by taking away the resources an army needs to survive. Without food or clean water, soldiers become very weak. It can also stop an enemy from using local buildings for shelter. Sometimes, an army will even destroy its own castles. This is called "slighting," which means making a fort unusable.

Corfe Castke 57.JPG
Corfe Castke 57.JPG
By destroying these structures, the army prevents the enemy from living there. This makes it much harder for an invading force to stay in a new land.

Many different groups have used these methods throughout history. Long ago, the Scythians used it against the Persian Empire. They were nomadic herders who moved across the steppes. They destroyed food and poisoned wells to stop King Darius the Great.

Robert the Bruce stipple engraving.jpg
Robert the Bruce stipple engraving.jpg
In the 4th century BC, a group called the Ten Thousand saw grass being burned. Later, during the Second Punic War, Romans burned grain to stop Hannibal. These leaders all chose to destroy things to gain an advantage.

History shows many specific and sometimes very difficult examples. In 1069, William the Conqueror used a brutal method in northern England. His men burned villages to stop a rebellion. This caused many people to die from hunger during the winter.

AtaculdeNoapte.jpg
AtaculdeNoapte.jpg
In the 1500s, the Knights in Malta harvested all crops early. They even poisoned wells with herbs to stop an Ottoman attack. In 1462, Vlad the Impaler used scorched-earth tactics in Wallachia. He wanted to stop the massive army of Sultan Mehmed II.

These events show how war can change the land for a long time. Some areas took many years to recover from the damage. Today, there are international rules to help prevent these things from happening. The 1977 Geneva Conventions made it illegal to use these tactics against civilians. This rule is meant to protect people who are not part of the fighting.

After Greek atrocity August 1922.jpg
After Greek atrocity August 1922.jpg
It helps ensure that even in hard times, people are treated with more care.

424 words

A scorched-earth policy is a military strategy focused on total resource destruction. The goal is to remove everything an enemy needs to fight. This includes the deprivation of food, water, plants, and animals. Armies also target human infrastructure, such as tools, roads, and buildings.

Sherman railroad destroy noborder crop.jpg
Sherman railroad destroy noborder crop.jpg
This method can be used by a retreating army to leave nothing of value. It can also be used by an advancing army to combat unconventional warfare. Because these tactics often hurt non-combatants, they are now banned under the 1977 Geneva Conventions.

The mechanism of scorched earth relies on breaking the enemy's logistics. Logistics refers to the supplies and movement required to maintain an army. By destroying crops, an army ensures the enemy cannot eat. By poisoning or destroying water sources, they prevent hydration.

Napoleons retreat from Moscow by Adolph Northen.jpg
Napoleons retreat from Moscow by Adolph Northen.jpg
Removing shelter and tools prevents the enemy from resting or repairing their equipment. This creates a chain reaction of weakness. Without these basic needs, an invading force becomes unable to sustain its momentum.

There are different ways this strategy is applied in warfare. One method is the destruction of resources to hinder an advance. Another method is used during a retreat to sabotage the pursuer. A third method is known as "slighting." Slighting is the deliberate destruction of a fortification, like a castle.

Corfe Castke 57.JPG
Corfe Castke 57.JPG
This makes the structure unusable as a fortress. This prevents an enemy from occupying and using the building as a base of operations.

History shows this strategy has been used for thousands of years. In the 6th century BC, the Scythians used it against the Persian Achaemenid Empire. They were nomadic herders who retreated into the steppes. They destroyed food and poisoned wells to stop King Darius the Great. In the 4th century BC, the Greek general Xenophon recorded that enemies burned grass to stop the "Ten Thousand."

Robert the Bruce stipple engraving.jpg
Robert the Bruce stipple engraving.jpg
During the Second Punic War in 218–202 BCE, Romans burned grain to stop Hannibal. These ancient examples show how common the tactic was.

The scale of destruction can be immense and long-lasting. During the Harrying of the North in 1069, William the Conqueror targeted northern England. His men burned villages and destroyed food stores. This was done to stop a rebellion. The destruction was so severe that between 100,000 and 150,000 people perished. The area took centuries to recover from this damage.

AtaculdeNoapte.jpg
AtaculdeNoapte.jpg
In the 17th century, French troops burnt over 20 substantial towns during the Nine Years' War. This was part of a plan to deny resources to German states.

Specific leaders have used these tactics to achieve very different goals. In the 15th century, Vlad the Impaler used scorched-earth tactics in Wallachia. He wanted to ward off the Ottoman army led by Sultan Mehmed II. In the 16th century, the Knights in Malta harvested all crops early. They even poisoned wells with herbs to stop an Ottoman attack in 1565. These stories show that the strategy is often a desperate response to a larger force.

Scorched earth is closely tied to the broader concept of total war. This is a type of conflict where everything is used to achieve victory. It connects to the study of logistics, geography, and international law. While the strategy can be effective, it has caused massive human suffering.

After Greek atrocity August 1922.jpg
After Greek atrocity August 1922.jpg
Modern laws like the Geneva Conventions now try to separate military goals from the protection of civilians. This helps define the limits of how wars are fought in the modern world.

604 words
🖼️ Images & Media (15)
File:F.O.C. Darley and Alexander Hay Ritchie - Sherman's March to the Sea.jpg
F.O.C. Darley and Alexander Hay Ritchie -...
File:Robert the Bruce stipple engraving.jpg
Robert the Bruce stipple engraving.jpg
File:Corfe Castke 57.JPG
Corfe Castke 57.JPG
File:AtaculdeNoapte.jpg
AtaculdeNoapte.jpg
File:Napoleons retreat from Moscow by Adolph Northen.jpg
Napoleons retreat from Moscow by Adolph...
File:Sherman railroad destroy noborder crop.jpg
Sherman railroad destroy noborder crop.jpg
File:Richmond va 1865 cropped 8x5.jpg
Richmond va 1865 cropped 8x5.jpg
File:Navajo on Long Walk.gif
Navajo on Long Walk.gif
File:VerskroeideAarde1 crop.jpg
VerskroeideAarde1 crop.jpg
File:The German Withdrawal To the Hindenburg Line, March-april 1917 Q5216.jpg
The German Withdrawal To the Hindenburg...
File:After Greek atrocity August 1922.jpg
After Greek atrocity August 1922.jpg
File:Chinese civilians to be buried alive.jpg
Chinese civilians to be buried alive.jpg

+ 3 more

Up Next
📖
Asymmetric warfare
Society
More to explore

What is Nepedia?

A free, ad-free encyclopedia for children. Every article is written at five reading levels, so the same page works for a five-year-old and a fifteen-year-old — use the level switcher above to see this one change. No account needed to read.