Log in Sign up
Back to Discover
📖

Negative and positive atheism

philosophy religion Maturity 13-18 religion
This article covers sensitive topics: religion. Parents can manage visibility in Parental Controls.

Some people do not believe in a god. They might say there is no god. Or they might just not believe. It is a big thing to think about. Many people have different ideas. What do you think about it?

40 words

Some people do not believe in a god. There are two main ways to think about this. One way is called negative atheism. These people do not believe in a god. But they do not say for sure that no god exists.

Another way is called positive atheism. These people say that no god exists. They make a strong claim about it. Some thinkers use different names for these ideas. They may use words like "weak" or "strong."

Some people have never heard of a god. They are part of the first group. This is because they do not have a belief. It is interesting to see how people think.

112 words

People have different ways of thinking about gods. Some people do not believe in any gods. This idea is called atheism. There are two main types of this view.

One type is negative atheism. People call this weak atheism too. These people do not believe in a god. But they do not say for sure that no god exists. This group includes many people. It includes children who have never heard of gods. It also includes people who have not thought much about it.

The other type is positive atheism. Some call this strong atheism. These people make a firm claim. They say that no gods exist. A positive atheist is also a negative atheist. But a negative atheist is not always a positive one.

Some thinkers use other names. George H. Smith used the words implicit and explicit. An implicit atheist does not state their view. An explicit atheist says their view out loud.

People do not always agree on these names. Richard Dawkins is a famous thinker. He does not use the term strong atheist for himself. He says he is a de facto atheist. This means he lives as if there is no god.

197 words

People have many different ideas about gods. Some people do not believe in any gods at all. This way of thinking is called atheism. Philosophers divide this idea into two main groups. The first group is called negative atheism. Some people also call this weak atheism or soft atheism. These people do not believe in any gods. However, they do not say for sure that no gods exist.

Positive atheism is a different way of looking at things. People also call this strong atheism or hard atheism. A positive atheist makes a very firm claim. They say that it is false that any gods exist. This type of atheism is a special case of negative atheism. This means every positive atheist is also a negative atheist. But not every negative atheist is a positive one. This is because some people lack a firm claim.

Many thinkers have helped define these different ideas. Antony Flew used the terms in 1976. George H. Smith wrote about these ideas in 1990. He used the words implicit and explicit atheism. An implicit atheist does not state their view out loud. An explicit atheist says their view clearly. Smith also wrote an excerpt in 2003. He grouped certain people under the negative atheism label. This includes children who have never heard of gods. It also includes people who have not thought about gods much.

Some people fit into the negative atheism group in unique ways. This includes agnostics who do not pick a side. Agnostics find the idea of a god uncertain. It also includes people called theological noncognitivists. Anthony Kenny is a philosopher who uses this term. These people think talk about gods is meaningless. Some people might even change their labels based on the god. They might be a positive atheist for one god. But they might be a negative atheist for another. This happens because the word god can mean many things.

Not all thinkers agree on how to use these names. Richard Dawkins is a well-known person who disagrees. He wrote a book called The God Delusion. Dawkins does not use the term strong atheist for himself. He calls himself a de facto atheist instead. He views the chance of a god as a scale. This scale goes from very high to very low. He uses the word agnostic for the middle parts. This shows that even experts have different ways to describe beliefs.

413 words

Atheism is a term used to describe the lack of belief in deities. Within the study of philosophy and religion, thinkers divide this concept into different categories. These categories help clarify exactly what a person does or does not claim. The two primary classifications are negative atheism and positive atheism. Negative atheism is also known as weak atheism or soft atheism. It describes a position where a person does not believe in any gods. However, these individuals do not necessarily make an explicit claim that no gods exist. Positive atheism is also called strong atheism or hard atheism. This group goes a step further by asserting that no deities exist.

To understand the relationship between these two, one must look at their logical structure. Positive atheism is considered a special case of negative atheism. This means that every person who is a positive atheist is also a negative atheist by necessity. However, the reverse is not true. A person can be a negative atheist without being a positive one. This happens when they lack the specific assertion that gods are false. The distinction often rests on whether the lack of belief is implicit or explicit. An explicit atheist makes a clear, stated claim about the non-existence of gods. An implicit atheist simply does not hold a belief in any deities.

George H. Smith, a philosopher, used these terms to describe implicit and explicit atheism. He noted that implicit atheists include several different types of people. For example, children who have never heard of deities are implicit atheists. Adults who have heard of gods but never given the idea much thought are also included. Furthermore, agnostics who suspend their belief about deities fall into this category. These individuals do not reject the possibility of a god, but they do not believe in one either. Because they do not assert that gods are false, they fit under the negative or weak atheism label.

Because the word "god" can have many different meanings, a person's stance might change. This depends on the specific conception of a deity being discussed. For instance, one might look at the God of classical theism. This deity is often described as a personal, supreme being. This being is considered omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent, and omnibenevolent. A person might be a positive atheist regarding this specific type of God. However, they might only be a negative atheist regarding a deistic conception of God. In that case, they reject the belief but do not explicitly claim the deity is false.

Philosophers have also created even more specific sub-categories within negative atheism. Anthony Kenny, another philosopher, distinguishes between different types of thinkers. He identifies agnostics as those who find the claim "God exists" to be uncertain. He also mentions theological noncognitivists. These are people who believe that all talk regarding gods is actually meaningless. This shows how complex the different ways of thinking can become when scholars try to define them accurately.

History shows that these definitions have been refined by many different people over time. Antony Flew introduced the terms "negative atheism" and "positive atheism" in 1976. Since then, other writers have expanded on these ideas. George H. Smith wrote about these concepts in his 1990 work, "Atheism, Ayn Rand, and Other Heresies." He also provided further explanations in an excerpt in 2003. Michael Martin has also used these terms in his own writings since 1990.

Not all prominent thinkers agree on how to use these specific classifications. Richard Dawkins, a well-known author, avoids the negative/positive atheism divide. In his book, "The God Delusion," he uses a different method. He views the existence of God on a scale of probability. This scale ranges from "very high" to "very low." He uses the term "agnostic" for people who fall in the middle of that scale. Dawkins describes himself as a "de facto atheist" rather than a "strong atheist." This highlights how different frameworks can change how we categorize human belief.

667 words
Up Next
📖
History of atheism
Philosophy Religion
More to explore

🔬 Go deeper

More advanced topics to explore

🪜 Step back

Simpler topics to build understanding

What is Nepedia?

A free, ad-free encyclopedia for children. Every article is written at five reading levels, so the same page works for a five-year-old and a fifteen-year-old — use the level switcher above to see this one change. No account needed to read.